1
Use of Ford APQP Status Report
2
Use of Ford APQP Status Report
n APQP Overview
n Introduction to Ford APQP Status Reporting System
n How to use Ford APQP Status Reporting System
n Q&A
3
APQP Overview
n APQP is a structured method for guiding an
organization to execute the necessary actions
to ensure that the product satisfies the
customers.
n APQP is a supplier-led program that is
applicable for all systems, subsystems and
components levels.
4
APQP Overview- The Goal of APQP
n The goal of APQP is to facilitate communication
between all involved personnel and disciplines
in a program by completing all required steps
on time, at acceptable cost and quality levels.
Flawless product launch will result.
5
Elements of APQP (AIAG)
n 19 are from the AIAG APQP and Control Plan manual.
¡ Facilities / Tools / Gauges
¡ Prototype Builds
¡ Drawings and Specifications
¡ Team Feasibility Commitment
¡ Measurement Systems
Evaluation
¡ Packaging Specifications
¡ Production Trial Run
¡ Preliminary Process Capability
Study
¡ Production Validation Testing
¡ Production Part Approval
(PSW)
¡ Design FMEA
¡ Design Verification Plan &
Report
¡ Prototype Build Control Plan
¡ Manufacturing Process Flow
Chart
¡ Process FMEA
¡ Pre-Launch Control Plan
¡ Operation Process
Instructions
¡ Production Control Plan
¡ Design & Mfg. Review(s)
6
AIAG APQP Timing Chart
Feedback Assessment & Corrective Action
反馈、评估和纠正措施
Product & Process Validation
产品与过程确认
Process Design & Development
过程设计和开发
Product Design & Development
产品设计和开发
Prototype Build
样件制造
Plan & Define
计划与定义
7
Ford APQP Status Reporting System
n An improvement of the AIAG APQP system.
n Four additional elements
n Elements start and finish are tied to program
milestones.
8
Purpose of APQP Status Report
n Common APQP expectations for internal and
external suppliers to Ford Motor Company
n Common APQP process metrics
n A common program status reporting format
n Roles and responsibilities for those involved in
APQP element implementation.
Establishing:
9
Ford APQP Status Reporting System
n 23 elements.
¡ 19 elements from AIAG APQP, plus
¡ 4 Ford unique elements. They are:
n Sourcing Decision
n Customer Input Requirements
n Subcontractor APQP Status
n Craftsmanship
10
Approach of Ford APQP
n This status reporting guideline describes 23 key
APQP elements.
n Ford Motor Company expectations are defined for
these key elements in definitions, and detailed
checklists.
n The status for these elements is summarized using
metrics described in the Reporting section.
n This status reporting guideline is written from a
supplier standpoint.
11
The Applicability of Ford APQP
n APQP status reporting is a requirement of all
internal and external suppliers to Ford
n APQP must be done for new programs/parts
and major part changes as appropriate.
12
APQP Process Flow
13
The APQP Process includes 5 main functions:
1. Planning of the APQP elements
2. Execution of the APQP elements
3. Monitoring the "Quality-of-Event" of the
execution of the elements, as well as the
timing, by the team in-between milestones
4. Issues Resolution
5. Status Reporting (minimum at each
milestones)
14
Use of Ford APQP Status Report
n How to use Ford APQP Status Report for
Emerging Market Re-sourcing Programs.
15
Backgrounds of APQP for Emerging Market
Re-sourcing Programs --- Ford APQP
n Ford APQP Status Report is one Excel file with 26
work sheets.
n 2 Summary sheets
1) APQP Status Report (linked)
2) APQP Status Report (manual)
n 1 Information sheet
n 23 worksheets for 23 Ford APQP elements. One sheet for
each element.
n Ford APQP Status Report uses milestones from
Ford FPDS – Ford Product Development System.
16
Backgrounds of APQP for Emerging Market
Re-sourcing Programs --- Ford APQP
17
Backgrounds of APQP for Emerging Market
Re-sourcing Programs --- FPDS
n FPDS – Ford Product Development System
¡ Ford uses FPDS to Plan, Design, Develop and Launch
new vehicles.
¡ Championed by Ford PD.
¡ Contains 15 milestones. 12 of them are used in Ford
APQP Status Report .
18
FPDS
Optimize
Vehicle
System
Subsystem
Component
Product/Process
Design
C
ascade Ve
rif
y
Design/
Mfg.
Confirmation
Launch/
Mass Prod.
Confirmation
Update
Corporate
Memory
MANAGE
Define
Architecture
Program
Input
DEFINE
DESIGN
VERIFY AND LAUNCH
PS1KO PS2 SI PASC PH ST PR CP J1 FSLS
LR
CC
041 30 -350
19
FPDS – Definitions 15 Milestones
§ <KO> – Kick-Off (The beginning of program specific work)
§ <PS1> – Pre<SI>#1 (Mission/vision & target customers defined)
§ <PS2> – Pre<SI>#2 (Target ranges assessed)
§ <SI> – Strategic Intent (Initial program direction established)
§ <SC> – Strategic Confirmation (Teams confirms strategy/viability)
§ <PH> – Proportions & Handpoints (Vehicle proportion frozen)
§ <PA> – Program Approval (All targets become objectives)
§ (ST) – Surface Transfer (Interior/exterior surface provided)
§ <PR> – Product Readiness (Designs ready for CP builds)
§ (CP) – Confirmation Prototype (First CP vehicle available)
20
FPDS – Definitions 15 Milestones (cont’d)
§ <CC> – Change Cut-Off (Commitment to Job #1 timing)
§ <LR> – Launch Readiness (Engineering Sign-off complete)
§ <LS> – Launch Sign-Off (Ready to Launch)
§ <J1> – Job #1 Achieved (Start Production)
§ <FS> – Final Status
21
Backgrounds of APQP for Emerging Market
Re-sourcing Programs --- EMLP
n EMLP – Emerging Market Launch Plan
¡ Developed to track status of Emerging Market re-
sourcing programs within Ford.
¡ Championed by Ford EMS PD.
Microsoft Excel
Worksheet
22
Backgrounds --- EMLP (cont’d)
n EMLP – Emerging Market Launch Plan
¡ 7 milestones, from program approval to part arrival at Ford receiving
plant.
n GSSM+2W – GSSM+2 weeks. EMLP kick-off; issue sourcing agreement.
n PR – Product Readiness. 2D drwgs/3D model/DFMEA received by supplier.
n CP – Confirmation Prototype. Prototype parts built; “DV” test started.
n ESO – Engineering Sign Off. “DV” test completed;
n PSW/LS – PSW/Launch Sign. PSW and functional sign-off completed.
n SJ1 – Supplier Job 1. Supplier ships out first production shipment.
n IPD – In Plant Date. Parts received at Ford plant(s).
23
Two Systems, One Objective
Flawless Launch!!
APQP feeds EMLP
EMLP
(Championed by Ford PD)
APQP
(Championed by Supplier)
24
APQP for Emerging Market Re-sourcing
vs. Ford APQP
n APQP for EM Re-sourcing uses 7 EMLP
milestones (for re-sourcing programs);
n APQP uses 12 FPDS milestones (for new
programs).
25
APQP for Emerging Market Re-sourcing
vs. Ford APQP
Supplier/Org: Program:
Location: Model Year: Part Number:
Supplier Code: EMLP/FPDS Milestone: Notice Level:
Contact Name/Tel: Review Date: User Plant:
<SI> <SC> <PH> <PA> (ST) <PR> (CP) <CC> <LR> <LS> (J1) <FS>
EMLP MILESTONE GSSM+2 <PR> (CP) ESO PSW/LS SJ1 IPD
n/a n/a n/a 01-一月-05 n/a 01-二月-05 01-三月-05 n/a 01-四月-05 01-五月-05 01-六月-05 01-七月-05
1.
2.
3. n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
FPDS MILESTONE
APQP ELEMENT
Sourcing Decision
Customer Input Requirements
Craftsmanship
Design FMEA
Draw ings & Specif ications
Team Feasibility Commitment
Design/Manufacturing Review (s)
Design Verif ication Plan & Report
Subcontractor PSW Status
Facilities, Tools & Gages
Preliminary Process Capability Study
Production Validation Testing
Operator Process Instructions
Packaging Specif ications
Production Trial Run
Production Control Plan
Manufacturing Process Flow chart
Process FMEA
Advanced Product Quality Planning for EM Resourcing
Status Report
Part Name:
OVERALL APQP STATUS RATING (GYR)
Part Submission Warrant (PSW)
Measurement Systems Evaluation
Pre-Launch Control Plan
Prototype Build Control Plan
Prototype Build(s)
FPDS Milestones
Remain for Reference
EMLP Milestones
Added
26
APQP for Emerging Market Re-sourcing
vs. Ford APQP
n APQP for EM Re-sourcing uses 7 EMLP
milestones (for re-sourcing programs); APQP
uses 12 FPDS milestones (for new programs).
n APQP for EM eliminates New Program specific
requirements, which are not required for Re-
sourcing Programs, from APQP . Maintains
original APQP requirements as guideline.
27
APQP for Emerging Market Re-sourcing
vs. Ford APQP
APQP Element Rating Checklist
5. Design / Manufacturing Reviews
Item
Program
Timing
Supplier
Timing
Expectations (Resourced Programs) <PA> (ST) <PR> (CP) <CC> <LR> <LS> (J1) <FS> Original APQP Expectation
Item
Start
Actual
Finish
Actual
Expectations (Resourced Programs) GSSM
+2W <PR> (CP) ESO
PSW
<LS> SJ1 IPD Original APQP Expectation
6. dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy Does not apply to resourced programs Participate in appearance and clay reviews, as appropriate.
7. dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy
Ensure that the Reviews contain data reviews of documents
including FMEA's, DVP&R, Government Regulations, Control
Plans, etc., with an emphasis on a Quality-Of-Event for each
phase of the design and manufacturing process.
Ensure that the Reviews contain data reviews of documents
including FMEA's, DVP&R, Government Regulations, Control
Plans, etc., with an emphasis on a Quality-Of-Event for each
phase of the design and manufacturing process.
8. dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy Does not apply to resourced programs
Ensure that Government Regulations (. stop ships, recalls,
etc.) and Campaign issues are reviewed.
9. dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy Does not apply to resourced programs
Ensure that Serviceability and Repairability concerns are
reviewed.
10. dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy
Ensure that concerns involving Material Handling, Material
Planning & Logistics (MP&L), and Global Logistics concerns
are reviewed during the meetings.
Ensure that concerns involving Material Handling, Packaging
Engineering (PE), Material Planning & Logistics (MP&L),
Synchronous Material Flow (SMF), and Global Logistics
concerns are reviewed during the meetings.
11. dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy Ensure that Cost concerns are reviewed. Ensure that Cost concerns are reviewed.
12. dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy
Ensure that issues are tracked and assignments are made to
work on and resolve any open issues between reviews.
Ensure that issues are tracked and assignments are made to
work on and resolve any open issues between reviews.
Other
Overall dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy Team's Overall Rating of this Element ( G/Y/R )
Eliminates New Program
specific requirements
Maintains original APQP
requirements as guideline
28
APQP for Emerging Market Re-sourcing
vs. Ford APQP
n APQP for EM Re-sourcing uses 7 EMLP milestones (for
re-sourcing programs); APQP uses 12 FPDS
milestones (for new programs).
n APQP for EM eliminates New Program specific
requirements, which are not required for Re-sourcing
Programs, from APQP . Maintains original APQP
requirements as guideline.
n Checklist includes additional EMLP unique Supplier
responsible requirements for the 23 elements. (At bottom
of the checklist for each element.)
29
APQP for Emerging Market Re-sourcing
vs. Ford APQP
APQP Element Rating Checklist
11. Drawings and Specifications: Design Information
Item Start Target
Program
Timing
Supplier
Timing
Expectations (Resourced Programs) <SI> <SC> <PH> <PA> (ST) <PR> (CP) <CC> <LR> <LS> (J1)
Item
Start
Target
Finish
Target
Start
Actual
Finish
Actual
Expectations (Resourced Programs) GSSM
+2W <PR> (CP) ESO
PSW
<LS> SJ1
8.
KO
SI
PR
PR
dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy
Identify reference dimensions to minimize inspection layout
time.
9.
KO
SI
PR
PR
dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy
Identify sufficient control points and datum surfaces to design
functional gages and test equipment.
10.
KO
SI
PR
PR
dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy
Ensure tolerances and part specifications are compatible with
accepted manufacturing standards for gauges and equipment.
11.
KO
SI
PR
PR
dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy
Identify any specified requirements that cannot be evaluated
using known inspection techniques.
12.
KO
SI
PR
PR
dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy
MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS
Identify special material characteristics, (. affected by
temperature, humidity, etc.)
13.
KO
SI
PR
PR
dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy
Consider material characteristics to minimize handling, storage
requirements, and affect to/from the environment.
EMLP
KO PR dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy
Supplier to confirm Purchasing has explained E-108 Branding
Policy, and confirm with PD that the drawing reflects this
policy requirement.
Other
O verall KO PR dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy Team's Overall Rating of this Element ( G/Y/R )
The Drawings & Specifications element is an evaluation of the development of Targets and Specifications as they are
defined to be input to the design process (. VDS/SDS/CDS), and to the Drawings (including all engineering drawings,
CAD data, material specifications and engineering specifications.)
Additional EMLP unique Supplier
responsible requirements
30
APQP for Emerging Market Re-sourcing
vs. Ford APQP
n APQP for EM Re-sourcing uses 7 EMLP milestones (for re-sourcing
programs); APQP uses 12 FPDS milestones (for new
programs).
n APQP for EM eliminates New Program specific requirements, which
are not required for Re-sourcing Programs, from APQP .
Maintains original APQP requirements as guideline.
n Checklist includes additional EMLP unique Supplier responsible
requirements for the 23 elements. (At bottom of the checklist for
each element.)
n Worksheet of “Action Plan” has been added to APQP for EM, to
reduce “copies and pastes” of action plans from 23 elements to the
summary sheet.
31
APQP for Emerging Market Re-sourcing
vs. Ford APQP
Sheet of “Action Plan” has
been added.
32
APQP for Emerging Market Re-sourcing
vs. Ford APQP
n APQP for EM Re-sourcing uses 7 EMLP milestones (for re-sourcing
programs); APQP uses 12 FPDS milestones (for new
programs).
n APQP for EM eliminates New Program specific requirements, which
are not required for Re-sourcing Programs, from APQP .
Maintains original APQP requirements as guideline.
n Checklist includes additional EMLP unique Supplier responsible
requirements for the 23 elements. (At bottom of the checklist for
each element.)
n Worksheet of “Action Plan” has been added to APQP for EM, to
reduce “copies and pastes” of action plans from 23 elements to the
summary sheet.
n For forward model (new) programs, Ford APQP should be used.
33
Complete APQP Status Report –
For EM Re-sourcing programs
1. Complete Information
Sheet
FPDS MILESTONES <KO> <SI> <SC> <PH> <PA> (ST) <PR> (CP) <CC> <LR> <LS> (J1) <FS>
EMLP MILESTONES <KO> GSSM+2 <PR> (CP) ESO PSW/<LS> SJ1 IPD
Enter Actual Dates >> 15-十二月-04 n/a n/a n/a 01-一月-05 n/a 01-二月-05 01-三月-05 n/a 01-四月-05 01-五月-05 01-六月-05 ########
Part Number Part Description Notice Level
PSW
Date 1
PSW
Date 2
Max CPV
Weekly
Ave CPV
Weekly
Ave
CPV/hr
Run@Rate
Date
Duration
(# hrs run)
Quantity
(# pcs run)
# Parts/Hr
Achieved
%
1st Yield
Pass
(Y/N)
High Impact Supplier ? : yes/no
Risk 1
Risk 2
Risk 3
Team Members Company / Role Tel#
Supplier Exec Champion
Ford Exec Champion
Build Event QTY MRD # SCs # CCs # SCs # CCs
Element / Item Date of Change/Item
LOG OF CHANGES / SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES for STATUS REPORT
Description of Change/Item
Remarks
CAPACITY REQ'TS RUN-AT-RATE INFO
Fax# Email
Plan to address Risk 2
Plan to address Risk 3
RISK INFORMATION (SITE, TECHNOLOGY, PROCESS, OTHER - HIGH IMPACT ??)
INFORMATION WORKSHEET - APQP STATUS REPORTING FOR EMLP RESOURCING
PROGRAM INFORMATION (dates w ill show up on linked APQP Status Report and individual checklists)
PART INFO & PSW COMMITMENT
TEAM INFORMATION
Description of Risk 1
Description of Risk 2
Description of Risk 3
Plan to address Risk 1
BUILD EVENT INFORMATION - PROTOTYPE (DV)
MRDQTY
BUILD EVENT INFORMATION - PRODUCTION (PV)
Build Event
PV
Input milestone dates. Should
be same as timing plan.
Input Part Number and
PPAP information.
Input team information, for
both supplier and Ford.
Input program change
history, if any.
34
Complete APQP Status Report –
For EM Re-sourcing programs -- continue
2. Complete Program
Information on sheet
of “APQP Status
Report (linked)”.
Supplier/Org: Program:
Location: Model Year: Part Number:
Supplier Code: EMLP/FPDS Milestone: Notice Level:
Contact Name/Tel: Review Date: User Plant:
<SI> <SC> <PH> <PA> (ST) <PR> (CP) <CC> <LR> <LS> (J1) <FS>
ABC
FPDS MILESTONE
DDZZA
China 2006
Advanced Product Quality Planning for EM Resourcing
Status Report
Tom/021-23452345 Lima Engine Plant
EN/FN
PR
7-20-2004
Camshaft
ABAB-9922-AB
XXXXXXXXXXX
Part Name:
35
Complete APQP Status Report –
For EM Re-sourcing programs -- continue
3. Review status of 23 elements.
Next slide uses status review of element 11,
drawing and specs, at PR as an example.
36
Sample Check sheet at PR
APQP Element Rating Checklist
11. Drawings and Specifications: Design Information
Item Start Target
Program
Timing
Supplier
Timing
Expectations (Resourced Programs) <SI> <SC> <PH> <PA> (ST) <PR> (CP) <CC> <LR> <LS> (J1)
Item
Start
Target
Finish
Target
Start
Actual
Finish
Actual
Expectations (Resourced Programs) GSSM
+2W <PR> (CP) ESO
PSW
<LS> SJ1
1.
KO
SI
--- dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy
There are NO major Drawings and Specification
issues/inhibitors, that will create an uncontainable risk now or
in the foreseeable future.
G G
2.
KO
SI
PR
PR
dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy
Define the cross-functional team for the development of the
Drawings, Specifications, and Quality Targets including design
engineering, process engineering, suppliers, quality, etc., as
applicable.
Y G
3.
KO
SI
PR
PR
dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy
ENGINEERING DRAWINGS
Identify dimensions that affect fit, function, durability and
customer satisfaction. Final drawing (or CAD Master) is
available at supplier no later than CP.
Y Y
4.
KO
SI
PR
PR
dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy
Ensure that Welding Specifications (including Weld Groups or
similar weld classifications) are identified and placed on weld
illustrations and/or drawings.
N/A N/A
12.
KO
SI
PR
PR
dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy
MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS
Identify special material characteristics, (. affected by
temperature, humidity, etc.)
G G
13.
KO
SI
PR
PR
dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy
Consider material characteristics to minimize handling, storage
requirements, and affect to/from the environment.
EMLP
KO PR dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy
Supplier to confirm Purchasing has explained E-108 Branding
Policy, and confirm with PD that the drawing reflects this
policy requirement.
Y Y
Other
O verall KO PR dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy Team's Overall Rating of this Element ( G/Y/R ) Y Y
n/a n/a n/a 01-一月-05 n/a Today 01-三月-05 n/a 01-四月-05 01-五月-05 01-六月-05
Instructions: Consider status of Expectations and then enter Overall Rating for that milestone. Enter open issues/comments/risks & resolution plans below. Rate this element based
on the Expectations that should be complete at the milestone (boxed areas). Future Expectations should be considered when developing a Plan for completion of this Element.
If a particular "Expectations" item is not applicable, enter "N/A" in the Milestone/Team Event column. Additional lines have been left blank, and may be used by Teams to add additional Expectations.
Actions/Tasks to satisfy an Expectation may need to be IN PROGRESS before they become due. Teams may enter "% complete", or similar rating, for their own use in tracking progress/status if desired.
Item Ford Supplie r Ope n Close
3 Ford PD 04-五月-04
Ford Motor Co. The Drawings & Specifications element is an evaluation of the development of Targets and Specifications as they are
defined to be input to the design process (. VDS/SDS/CDS), and to the Drawings (including all engineering drawings,
CAD data, material specifications and engineering specifications.)
3D Cad Master model is incomplete
Corrective Actions / Resolution Plan
Ford PD will complete model by CP
Issues / Comments / Risks
Light Gray shaded cells:
Review expectation at
these milestones.
If R or Y, this issue requires
corrective action
If R or Y, review at next
milestone (until it’s G), even if
“Finish Target” date is passed.
Overall status is worst rating of
all expectations. Manual input
is NOT required.
Record identified issue and
corrective action here.
Status Can be updated
continuously until
Milestone Date is met
Prior Milestone
Status is Frozen
Input actual start and finish
dates for each expectation.
37
Rating and Assessment – G/Y/R Status
Risk Color Definition
High Red Target dates and/or deliverables are at risk. A recovery work
plan is not available and/or implemented, or the work plan does
not achieve program targets.
Moderate Yellow Target dates and/or deliverables are at risk, but a resourced
recovery work plan has been developed to achieve program
targets, and has been approved by the appropriate
Management Team.
Low Green Target dates and deliverables are on track and meeting
objectives.
38
Complete APQP Status Report –
For EM Re-sourcing programs -- continue
4. Complete the summary sheet on “APQP Status Report (linked)”.
Supplier/Org: Program:
Location: Model Year: Part Number:
Supplier Code: EMLP/FPDS Milestone: Notice Level:
Contact Name/Tel: Review Date: User Plant:
<SI> <SC> <PH> <PA> (ST) <PR> (CP) <CC> <LR> <LS> (J1) <FS>
EMLP MILESTONE GSSM+2 <PR> (CP) ESO PSW/LS SJ1 IPD
n/a n/a n/a 01-一月-05 n/a 01-二月-05 01-三月-05 n/a 01-四月-05 01-五月-05 01-六月-05 01-七月-05
1. G
2. Y G
3. n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
4. G G
5. Y Y
6. Y G
7. G G
8. G Y
9. G G
10. G G
11. Y Y
12. G G
13. G G
14. Y Y
15. G Y
16. G
17. G G
18. G G
19. G G
20.
21.
22.
23.
Y YOVERALL APQP STATUS RATING (GYR)
Part Submission Warrant (PSW)
Measurement Systems Evaluation
Pre-Launch Control Plan
Prototype Build Control Plan
Prototype Build(s)
Advanced Product Quality Planning for EM Resourcing
Status Report
Tom/021-23452345 Lima Engine Plant
EN/FN
PR
7-20-2004
Camshaft
ABAB-9922-AB
XXXXXXXXXXX
Part Name:
2006
Preliminary Process Capability Study
Production Validation Testing
Operator Process Instructions
Packaging Specif ications
Production Trial Run
Production Control Plan
Manufacturing Process Flow chart
Process FMEA
Draw ings & Specifications
Team Feasibility Commitment
Design/Manufacturing Review (s)
Design Verif ication Plan & Report
Subcontractor PSW Status
Facilities, Tools & Gages
Sourcing Decision
Customer Input Requirements
Craftsmanship
Design FMEA
ABC
FPDS MILESTONE
APQP ELEMENT
DDZZA
China
Auto-linked to the overall
status of the checksheet
for this element.
Overall status is worst rating of
all elements. Manual input is
NOT required.
39
22.
23.
Y Y
# Activity Open Close Ford Supplier
Input/see action plans to R and Y issues on next sheet
(Sheet of "Action Plan")!!
Production Validation Testing
(summarize the concern & resulting risk)
Corrective Action / Resolution Plan
(. revise timing, allocate resources)
ResponsibilityTiming
OVERALL APQP STATUS RATING (GYR)
Element / Activity Issue(s) for Red/Yellow Elements
Part Submission Warrant (PSW)
Complete APQP Status Report –
For EM Re-sourcing programs -- continue
4. Complete action plan on summary sheet.
Do not input action plans on the bottom part of “APQP Status
Report (linked)”.
40
Complete APQP Status Report –
For EM Re-sourcing programs -- continue
4. Complete action plan on summary sheet - continue.
Header information is linked
from “APQP Status Report
(linked)” sheet.
Copy and paste action plans for
all R and Y issues from 23
elements.
Input Element #.
41
APQP Status Report
n Supplier must submit Status Report to the CSO STA
every month, and two weeks before each milestone.
n STA Site Engineer verifies supplier APQP status and
report-outs meet milestone timing.
n Ford Cross functional team must hold regular APQP
reviews (minimum at each milestones) with Supplier to
evaluate overall program health.
n Supplier must maintain evidence book for each
element. Submit supporting documentation upon
request.
42
Use of Ford APQP Status Report
43
APQP Reference Information
n Obtain a copy of APQP Status Reporting System
for EM from your STA.
n Download APQP Status Reporting Guideline from
FSN Website at:
or the Ford Intranet at (for Ford employee only):
Ford APQP Status Report (for new programs) can
also be obtained by using above links.
44
Use of Ford APQP Status Report
Thank You!
